Considering how important Islam is to the culture of most Muslim majority countries, how come most non-Arab Muslim countries don't use or recognize Arabic more in the countries?

by [deleted]

In most non-Arab Muslim countries, even though Islam is a very strong and important part of their culture, Arabic is not recognized or used by the general population. While I understand its not necessary for someone to know Arabic to be a Muslim, considering how everything in Islam is based off Arabic, I'm surprised its not used more outside of religion. For example Indonesia, Pakistan, and Bangladesh are all non-Arab Muslim majority countries. They each speak Bahasa Indonesian, Urdu, and Bengali as their primary language. They don't even speak Arabic as a second language either. Those countries have English and Dutch as their primary second language. That's understandable. As those are the languages of the countries that used to rule them. All these countries, while diverse, have cultures very strongly connected with Islam (Note: I know not everyone in those countries is Muslim and all those countries have various diverse cultures that may or may not have Islamic influences. But the mainstream culture of these countries is still very influenced by Islam). Yet despite their cultures' ties with Islam, they do not seem to use Arabic at all outside of religion. I would like to know Arabic isn't a bigger part of those countries. Also, feel free to correct me on any mistakes or inaccuracies in my statements. I'm always willing to learn.

Blatherskitte

Two good books to read as an intro to Islamic history are J.J. Saunders "medieval Islam" and Jonathan Berkey "formation of Islam". Not necessarily the best but fairly cheap and available, Saunders is very readable but an Orientalist. The first non Arab region Islam expanded into was Persia which was and is dominated by Persian (of various dialects). Basically language pressure has to do generally with economic activity. Clerical languages exert little pressure, warfare is more important but trade is the ultimate determiner of language. Your question is too broad to break it down further without tremendous effort but Berkey does discuss the competition between Persian and Arabic in some detail. I don't have the book in front of me or I could give you a page number. I think most historians will agree that what ever becomes the "langue franca" is most readily spread. Islam as a religion more robustly than Arabic trade.