How were cities founded by traveling armies in antiquity?

by ekd-

I'm interested in the "usual" process of the foundation of a city by a traveling army such as Alexander's. However, since I imagine every foundation is different in terms of location, purpose and availability of materials and manpower, let's maybe take Alexandria (the one founded 331 BCE) as an example.

Wikipedia states (citing Arrian) Alexander sketched the plan out with grain, left a few month after its foundation and installed his "viceroy" as administrator. It doesn't go into more detail, perhaps due to a lack of sources? What is the current historians' view on the subject?

Some questions I came up with:

  • How large was the settlement at its beginning?
  • Was it planned to be a larger city from the beginning, or did it start as an outpost that attracted more and more merchants and people?
  • Where did those people come from?
  • What did the construction process look like?
  • Did soldiers have to help, or did they hire workers from "the next town over"?
  • Did Alexander leave behind a large force to continue constructing and defending the settlement?
  • I take it there were architects in Alexander's entourage. Did they stay with the settlement and help expand it? Or did they leave with Alexander? If they stayed, who constructed the next city?
  • Where did the construction materials come from?
  • How long did the entire process take until people thought of it as a city, and no longer a new, perhaps only temporary settlement?
theskyisnotthelimit

The size of the city was somewhat planned, though they usually expanded beyond their original designs. Here's a nice image of the plan of Alexandria in Egypt, though that would have been pretty elaborate as far as designs go, since it was planned to be an important city.

A lot of Greek settlers went out to settle in new towns. Many of them were veterans who were granted land in/near these new cities after they finished their service. Others might have been exiled from their original cities or deported. Natives of the conquered land would also be resettled to these cities, and probably made up most of the population. Wandering merchants, who often followed Greek armies around on their campaigns, might also settle in these cities.

Soldiers usually helped build the cities, but they may have had slaves/prisoners of war help as well. The roads would be put down, then maybe a civic building or two and a temple would be built.

There wouldn't have been too many architects, city building was based more on surveyors, who would lay out the roads in a grid then move on to the next town. It would be the rulers of the cities who would commission architects to build acropoli, temples, and other civic buildings to gain the favour of their citizens.

These towns were established as 'city states', so they were largely self-governing and were intended to be permanent. It probably didn't take long for them to be seen as a city, as they were designed to be cities.

My sources are "The Hellenistic World" by FW Wallbank and a multitude of primary sources that I read for my Ancient Greece class last semester.