Why do so many medieval and current European crests involve lions?

by Legere

I'm especially curious about older crests. I know lions had a much larger home range before extending across North Africa into Turkey and across lower Greece. It seems like an animal that would not be collectively known by the average European after the Romans and not again until exploration and the sciences re-emerged. Yet, medieval backwater peasant towns in France and even countries like Sweden (getting as far away from lion territory as possible) have lion crests. Is there some historical precedence for this, did they simply like the design or grandiose associations of lions, or am I wrong entirely and they have always known what lions were? Thanks

Dashukta

Folks in the Middle Ages of Europe were quite aware of what lions were. Sort of like how folks in the United States don't exactly live anywhere near the natural range of Snow Leopard, Komodo Dragon, or King Cobra--and most of us have probably never seen one in real life unless a local zoo happens to have one--but we still know what they are and what they look like.

    1. Contact, travel, and trade was extensive across Europe and beyond in the Middle Ages. Trade with Africa and the Middle East was frequent. There was never a time when the existence of lions was never not common knowledge in Europe.
    1. On occasion, captive lions would be transported north. The main entrance to the Tower of London is (and was) called Lion's Gate for a reason--the barbican and moat housed the royal menagerie, which included lions.
    1. Lions were also well-documented in literature of the time and earlier. Contemporary writers, Pliny the Elder, even the bible all speak of lions.
    1. Lions pop up in heraldry frequently because of the symbolism surrounding them. Lions were seen as brave, valiant, and strong--all traits seen worthy of emulation.
intangible-tangerine
Fyqpop

What about griffins and unicorns, did people think they are real when using them on heraldry?