Whether justified or not, and whether they were too harsh or perfectly reasonable, we all know that Germany believed that Versaille imposed harsh punishment they didn't deserve. But I know nothing about what was levied by the Entente on the other Central powers.
Were they comparable to Germany's obligations under Versaille?
How well were they followed?
Did they result in similar internal backlash, or were they more accepted?
Were they comparable to Germany's obligations under Versaille? How well were they followed?
Trianon, Sevres, and St. Germaine acknowledged that due to their territorial losses, Austria, Hungary, and Turkey would not be able to cover all of the Allies war costs in reparations (a similar admission was made in the Treaty of Versailles for Germany), therefore a fixed sum would not be set until 1920, and during that time payments in cash or kind would be made and some of which would be counted towards reparations payments. In the end, a total cost of 132 billion dollars was set for the Central Powers. Due to the Turkish resurgence and defeat of Greece, the Treaty of Lausanne superseded Sevres and Turkey was not obliged to make payments, while Austria and Hungary had defaulted by c. 1922 and their payments were dropped.
Bulgaria paid 173 million dollars towards reparations by 1922, and the total sum was brought down from c. 2.5 billion to c. 550 million, towards which Bulgaria paid 41 million between 1925 and 1929. Like Germany, their obligations were dropped by the Lausanne Conference in 1932.
Did they result in similar internal backlash, or were they more accepted?
Turkey was largely focused on state building in the 20s and 30s, with Ataturk at the helm. As for the other three, there was some backlash to the terms of the treaties, though I'm most familiar with Hungary's vehement opposition to the territorial confiscations of Trianon; in Austria of course there was some support for Anschluss with Germany.