We are covering the Jacksonian era and doing a project in which we place Jackson on "trial" for "Crimes against Humanity via Indian Removal", and I was wondering how could Jackson possibly justify his actions?
The short answer is that he subscribed to the notion (popular at the time) of paternalistic treatment ─ that Native Americans were primitive children that needed to be protected from the modern world and civilization until they themselves became civilized.
/u/Reedstilt had a really good summation in this thread, and I suggest you read it.
Is this a homework question? It says in our rules: Our users aren't here to do your homework for you, but they might be willing to help. Remember: AskHistorians helps those who help themselves. Don't just give us your essay/assignment topic and ask us for ideas. Do some research of your own, then come to us with questions about what you've learned. This is explained further in this [META] thread. You can also consider asking the helpful people at /r/HomeworkHelp.