What is known about "Torture Societies" in 17th Century Russia?

by CaramelCoveredKarma

I was reading Robert K. Massie's fantastic book, "Peter the Great" and I came across this passage:

Although public torture and execution were no novelty to any seventeenth-century European, what struck most visitors to Russia was the stoicism, “the unconquerable stubbornness” with which most Russians accepted these terrible agonies. They steadfastly resisted hideous pain, refusing to betray friends, and when condemned to death they went meekly and calmly to the gallows or block. An observer in Astrachan saw thirty rebels beheaded in less than half an hour. There was no noise or clamor. The condemned men simply went to the block and laid their heads in the pools of blood left by their predecessors. None even had his hands tied behind him. This incredible hardiness and unconquerable endurance of pain astonished not only foreigners but also Peter himself. Once, after a man had been tortured four times by knout and fire, Peter approached him in sheer wonder and asked how he could stand such great pain. The man was happy to talk about it and revealed to Peter the existence of a torture society of which he was a member. He explained that nobody was admitted without first being tortured, and that thereafter promotion within the society rested on being able to accept higher grades of torture.

What is known about these societies? Were they common? Why were they founded? How did they operate? Any information would be great.

dieLaunischeForelle

The people he tortured "by the fire and the knout" were palace guard musketeers ('streltsy') who rebelled in summer 1698 while tsar Peter was away on a trip to Europe. They pledged allegiance to Sophia Alexeyevna, they lost and the succeeding purges in the nobility were based on the testimony of only one man out of the hundreds who got tortured badly in the aftermath.

By the sound of it Massie is footing on the Petrine era excuse of why only one confession is enough to uncover a plot incriminating every noble Peter didn't like: the other musketeers must have been in some kind of a torture club.

The Russian historians since Karamzin sought alternative explanations: They might as well have had nothing to say. They were veterans of the Azov campaigns who previously made complaints about low pay and were about to be removed from Moscow to Velikiye Luki. It may as well have been a simple mutiny and not the foiled plot that it was made to be by Peter.

sources: see the chapters on Peter of every major Russian historian. George Vernadsky wrote a history of Russia in several tomes which is also available in English.