How likely is it that we know "the true" history in the past 100 years, since it's widely known that “History is written by the victors.” ?

by frosty11060

Basically, what I'm interested is how likely is all that to be true, I'm interested in all larger conflicts in the 20th century, like WW1, WW2, Cold War.

I heard somewhere that some countries and their intelligence agencies release top secret documents and things like that after some years, 50 or smth like that (it's highly possible that I am mistaken, so correct me if that's the case).

So is it possible that some of them are not going to be released ever, and I mean the huge ones, like, what happened after some decisive battle, what happened to some POWs, some crimes against humanity in occupied countries. Some espionage things from Cold War. Some reports of battle about how many casualties were there, or weren't. How many ships/tanks/planes were destroyed.

As for me, I have always wondered if those battles in Pacific in WW2 were such a disasters for IJN, like where they lost zillion ships and planes, and US lost like 2 destroyers and 3 boats.

What are your opinions on this? Are we getting the wrong history, beacuse “History is written by the victors.”?

Thanks in advance to whoever replies. :)

Georgy_K_Zhukov

So the trope of "Winners Write History" is hardly as clear cut as your premise pivots on. It has been addressed here in the past, and I would highly recommend you check out /u/agentdcf's excellent response to "How do Historians get around the "silent evidence" problem or the "Winners write history" problem?" as well as /u/restricteddata's answer to "Why should I believe what a historian writes?". Hope that helps.