Is "a lot of these 'unexplained' spooky mysteries can be more or less explained by ergot poisoning." a true statement?

by WirelessZombie

top comment here says ergot is the reason, posts under claim the title. I've heard this addressed here to a small extent but never fully explained.

Its fairly safe to consider bullshit since its from TIL (and about history) but I think there might be a cool answer from someone here about the topic explaining the extent of ergot poisoning as a theory for weird things or the extent to which it might be a respected theory. Salem is listed in the comments as well.

Something I vaguely recall in an r/askhistorians post is that there would be certain things present if it was ergot and those were absent.

MI13

/u/idjet addressed the main problems with explaining all phenomena like witchcraft with ergot poisoning in this comment. The quick and dirty answer is that ergot poisoning is not taken seriously by historians as an explanation for hardly anything, whether witchcraft or otherwise.