In WWI and WWII did Russia really not have enough rifles to go around?

by Rockguy101

Also did they actually give out wooden rifles to some men to make it look like they had guns? If they were short on rifles were they also short on almost all other equipment for soldiers?

spartanburger91

I am a little more familiar with the situation early in WWI than in WWII regarding shortages of arms and actual production capacities. All of the powers had shortages of small arms and made use of obsolete and captured or nonstandard equipment. Russia and Austria-Hungary made use of more or less anything they could get their hands on. Same for the French. France was reissuing Gras rifles, purchased Lee-Metford rifles, captured German equipment, and whatever else they could scrounge. Germany was issuing nonstandard Mausers and 1888 rifles to their troops, and Britain was issuing Japanese Arisaka rifles to the Royal Navy to free up SMLEs for the troops.

The real issue for the Russians was the rate at which they expended artillery shells relative to the rate at which they could make them. Firing about fifty thousand per day while being able to make thirty-five thousand per month can lead to anxiety.

I could be wrong, and if I am, somebody please correct me, but my understanding is that the Soviets actually did have enough small arms during WWII. Everything else, not so much, but small arms, yes.

Searocksandtrees

Hi! If you're wondering about specific battles/events/time periods, or pop culture references, mentioning those would help the war historians zoom in for more detail. Meanwhile, questions in the past have tended to focus on the Battle of Stalingrad in WWII (per the film Enemy at the Gates or the game Call of Duty); check these out:

All of these except the first post have been archived, so if you have follow-up questions, just ask them here & mention the relevant username to notify them