So i just heard of Wandervogel , a massive youth movement in Germany that apparently around 1901 was emptying colleges, basically they were inventing an alternative culture sort of like hippies: these youth were getting into folk music, wandering in the forests, living on farms, they valued authenticity, sexual freedom including homosexuality . apparently https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gustav_Wyneken played a role in developing this youth culture.
I hear all this ruckus caused some moral panic and was a factor in sending these youth to their death at the battle of Verdun... is this an exaggeration, is there something to it?
This is all I know about the Wandervogel movement, that existed from the late 1890s to the mid 1930s, and was a youth response to industrialization and their increasingly polluted cities and lifestyle (they were escapist romantics).
I hear all this ruckus caused some moral panic and was a factor in sending these youth to their death at the battle of Verdun... is this an exaggeration, is there something to it?
While I'm no expert on the movement itself, I can say that to attribute civilian responses in WWI Germany to a "moral panic", even in part, is exaggeration to say the least.
Social History of the war in general in the past 30-40 years has moved beyond the idea of a frenzied "war enthusiasm" overtaking the populations of the Great Powers. Jeffrey Verhey and Alexander Watson in particular have examined popular responses in Germany in their recent works The Spirit of 1914 and Enduring the Great War. German conscripts and volunteers by-and-large seem to have been motivated by a stoic determination, an intent to defend their homes and families from the enemy. "Moral Panic" cannot explain the resilience of the German Army at Verdun nor on the Somme in 1916, anymore than it can the way in which the German Army fought to the bitter end in 1917-18.