5 star general Douglas MacArthur spent 14 years outside of the United States (1937-1951) in the fighting and commanding forces in the Pacific. When he returned in 1951, his 13yr old son had never set foot in the US. Was this level of commitment to public service unusual, even for a general?

by mytimeoutside
Orlando1701

MacAurther retired from the US Army in 1937 at which time he became a general officer in the Philippine Army, so for a period of time he wasn't serving overseas as an American officer but was serving in a foreign military all together. He was recalled to the American military in 1941 and during the entirety of WWII he served in the pacific. During this time it was fairly common that other senior officers didn't return to the United States either due to the demand of their position. After WWII he was given command of all occupation forces and activities in Japan and of course took command of all UN forces at the start of the Korean War.

Now, at the same time there were two other things which kept him in the east. First transportation and logistics of that era were far more difficult. There existed no aircraft which could fly from the continental US to Japan without stopping. The second was that he had a very contentious relationship with many civilian leaders like Truman as well as many military leaders. MacAurther was know for being impossibly pompous. Indeed by the time of Korea he had taken to making his own policies even when they were contrary to offices US Policies, which is part of what got him removed from command during Korea. So, after WWII he basically had his own little empire in Japan.

TL;DR - 1937-1941 served as an officer in the Philippine Army, 1941-1945 busy with WWII, post-WWII basically became the military ruler of his own little empire.

Searocksandtrees

Hi all, a quick note from the moderators.

Do be aware that this post is in /r/AskHistorians, and as such, moderators will enforce this subreddit's rules. We're looking for answers from subject experts, which are in-depth, and based on solid sources. Personal anecdotes, guesses, unsubstantiated claims, and simple links to external sites are not accepted as answers: comments of that sort will be removed.

Do review the rules here before venturing to answer.

Thanks!

Edit: Since this mod note doesn't seem to have stemmed the tide of poor answers here, I thought I'd do some analysis on the comments so far just for fun.

At this moment, there are 32 removed comments. Those tally up as follows:

  • 15, or almost half, are remarks about removed comments. There's no mystery here people: they've been removed because they don't answer the question, and certainly not in any way up to subreddit standards.

  • 9 in one thread which starts with an incorrect answer, with resulting questions/objections

  • 2 personal anecdotes

  • 2 guesses/conjecture

  • 2 personal opinions about MacArthur; neither addressing the question

  • 1 trying to restate the question

  • 1 off-topic example