I asked this on /r/history yesterday and didn't get any valuable responses:
I am re-reading I, Claudius again for the third time, and I know it is a fictionalization, but that Graves based it on many historical sources.
So my question is, (as far as we know) did Claudius actually hold republican ideals and was he truly limited in enacting them by the threat of civil war or the suppressive power of the Praetorian guard?
NOTE: Republican in this sense meaning someone who favors the republic versus the monarchy of the roman empire.
This would be unlikely as the republic had been dead for, at this point, nearing on 70 years and considering the distrust between the Senate and Claudius, it would be unlikely he would be willing to resurrect it and place more power in the hands of the Senate. He further concentrated power in his hands through his use of freedmen in the government, something which would not be favorable to the republican senators as it further concentrated power in his hands and receded their control over the administration.
As to the praetorian Guard, they would not have been able to suppress his power to govern as he made several decisions, such as the use of freedmen in government, which would have not endeared him to the equites who commanded the praetorian guard.