Theory Thursday | Academic/Professional History Free-for-All

by AutoModerator

Previous weeks!

This week, ending in March 10 2016:

Today's thread is for open discussion of:

  • History in the academy

  • Historiographical disputes, debates and rivalries

  • Implications of historical theory both abstractly and in application

  • Philosophy of history

  • And so on

Regular participants in the Thursday threads should just keep doing what they've been doing; newcomers should take notice that this thread is meant for open discussion only of matters like those above, not just anything you like -- we'll have a thread on Friday for that, as usual.

caffarelli

I’m going to publish this book review here and not Sat R&R because I’m a loner Dottie, a rebel, and it’s professional literature on the historical method, soooo it’s appropriate here I think.

#Writing History in the Digital Age ed. by Jack Dougherty and Kristen Nawrotzki, 2013

I read a fair amount of professional literature books, most of which consist of frantically slapped-together tenure-seeking publish-or-perish crappy case studies, sold at high cost to professional book-buying idiots (librarians) like myself, and are overall pretty low-quality. This book, however, is decidedly not any of those things. It is free, thoroughly thought-provoking, and everyone on AskHistorians should read it. I have already made 4 mods read it. Now I will make you read it. Top 3 favorite essays:

  • The first chapter, “I nevertheless am a historian,” which is about the public DOING history as the newest wave of what “public history” means, is incredibly relevant to what we do here, and also what /r/badhistory is all about. I also have had it running through my head for a while, that phrase, “I nevertheless am a historian,” and don’t know how to get it out.

  • Putting Harlem on the Map talks about how data visualizations can help us see patterns in history we wouldn’t otherwise have noticed. There’s a lot of push for maps and mapping tools in history now, but I don’t see a lot of arguments for why we should be all going map crazy in history, so this is one concrete map-dependant historical insight that you can cling to in a flurry of mapped history that otherwise just seems to be making maps for the sake of making maps.

  • Conclusion chapter Makes an evidenced-based argument for the future of academic publishing in a post-print-screw-paywalls world and one possible model it can work on, as exemplified by this book. Most interestingly: the essays had traditional paid reviewers, but it was also open to also whatever random academics or non-academics found the book during its peer-review process, so the authors got reviews from both sources. Spoiler: authors could not successfully guess which of their reviews were paid and free.

Reeeed itttt.