I suppose I'm focusing on the U.K. specifically. We've all heard how the junior officers had no idea what they were doing, sending their men over the trenches for no logical reason, and the mid/high ranking officers were removed from the action and tried to wage a Napoleonic war strategically.
Edit: I'm not saying/implying that the majority of officers in WWII were incompetent. They obviously learned their lessons well during the inter-war period. I'm more interested if people in general were like "hey, during the last war, all these elites didn't exactly do so hot. Are they better prepared now?"
You appear to be basing your question out of a common WWI misconception. The idea and myth of the incompetence of the WWI officer corps has been widely debunked by modern scholarship.
See these excellent threads for more on this matter:
Why were English soldiers at the Battle of the Somme ordered to advance at walking pace?
How often did the trench storming during WW1 actually suceed and how high were the mortality rates?
How accurate is "Blackadder Goes Forth"?
How effective was British military and political leadership during World War 1?