I have often read about salt being an important good for trade in ancient times in Europe and the Middle East. However I don't remember something similar for sugar. Was sugar considered as important as salt? If it wasn't, why?

by Cauca
Thoctar

Sugar, while very valuable, is not necessary for survival. Sugar can be obtained from a wide variety of sources, including honey and fruits, whereas salt can only be obtained either from ground sources, which requires expensive transportation, or from evaporating seawater, a extremely time and labour-intensive process. Sugar was a luxury product that was eaten by the rich, whereas salt was essential for food preservation, particularly of meats. Remember, this is a time before refrigeration, so being able to salt something to make it last longer is critical. Also, salt is a necessary nutrient for survival, sugar is not. TL;DR: You need salt, both for nutritional purposes and food preservation, sugar was a luxury good that had a wide variety of potential sources and isn't necessary for survival.