Historical interpretations on the Sengoku period of Japan (mainly on Tokugawa Ieyasu)

by fruitspunches

I'd like to know what the main topic(s) of debate are for the Sengoku period of Japan. For example, whether or not Ieyasu truly brought peace and unity to Japan or whether or not it was inevitable (if you can give any interpretations on this example that would also be great).

jschooltiger

Hello there. Your question seems to be related to school work, so we just want to remind you, and any potential respondents, that our rules DO permit people to ask for help with their homework, so long as they are seeking clarification or resources, rather than the answer itself. This policy is further explained in this META Thread.

Additionally, while our users may be able to help you out here, we hope that you also will take the time to check out our six-part series, "Finding and Understanding Sources", which should hopefully prove to be helpful for you as you continue in your research.

ParallelPain

For example, whether or not Ieyasu truly brought peace and unity to Japan or whether or not it was inevitable

Toyotomi Hideyoshi unified Japan. His death caused Japan to take a step back into chaos, but the all decisive battle at Sekigahara and Tokugawa's political wrangling stopped that and forced everyone back to peace. That's what happened. Whether or not it's inevitable is conjecture.