A relatively well known example are the Mosuo peoples of central China.
They have a cultural practice of what can probably be called serial monogamy, though not necessarily.
Marriage as such does not exist, women and men are free to take on any partner they choose for as long as they like.
They are matrinlinear, and all children, regardless of their fathers are raised in the mother's household and by their uncles.
The father may or may not be part of the child's life, and children take on their mother's family name.
Marriage as an institution we are familiar with does not traditionally exist.
While you are certainly welcome to post this question here, you may also want to post in in /r/AskAnthropology since this is really more of an anthropological question (though someone here may certainly have the expertise to answer it).
It depends entirely on how you define "institution of marriage". Marriage is a very varied social phenomenon and there are many societies in which it's very different from the European tradition. There's polygamy, polygyny, arranged marriages, bridewealth and dowry systems, patriliny, matriliny, patrilocality, matrilocality, strict monogamy, serial monogamy, heteronormative marriages, same sex marriages, third gender marriages, non-sexual marriages, marriages that are only for sex and reproduction, ghost marriages, levirate marriages, sororate marriages, marriage ceremonies, marriages with no ceremony... the list goes on. I am sure you could quite easily find someone somewhere who views any one of those things as being fundamentally inimicable to their idea of "marriage".
Anthropologists tend to be broad in their definition. They use "marriage" to refer to any system of social norms surrounding relatively long-term romantic/sexual relationships. In that sense it is universal, because all societies seem to value some form of pair bonding.
However, if you have a more specific definition of marriage I'd be happy to try and come up with a more helpful answer.
Julius Caeser conquered much of Gaul (I.e. Western Europe). When he invaded Britain, he wrote an interesting observation.
“The most civilised of all these nations are they who inhabit Kent, which is entirely a maritime district, nor do they differ much from the Gallic customs.”
“Ten and even twelve have wives common to them, and particularly brothers among brothers, and parents among their children; but if there be any issue by these wives, they are reputed to be the children of those by whom respectively each was first espoused when a virgin”
Excerpt From: Caesar, Julius. “De Bello Gallico" and Other Commentaries.”
To what degree he was accurate and how widespread this was, I do not know.