After Columbus came to the Americas, the Native American populations were ravaged by disease, right? Why didn't the Vikings (who came first) also spread disease? Is there any evidence of this?

by ThankyouOak

Since yesterday was Columbus Day/Indigenous People's Day, I was remembering all of the problems that Columbus caused when he landed in the Americas- some argue that up to 90% of the indigenous population was killed by disease. I was also thinking about how the Vikings had actually "discovered" the Americas first, and IIRC there was some contact with the native population.

So, why didn't the disease spreading start then? Is there evidence of disease hitting the Americas before Columbus? Thoughts on this?

liedel
jschooltiger

Hi there, while there's always more to be said on the topic, you may be interested in this section of our FAQs on disease in the Americas.