How was the problem of crossing rivers solved in World War 2?

by Mattekillert

Thinking primarily about the war in the east with all the large rivers like the Volga but also the Rhine.

Were nations capable of building large enough pontoon bridges to sustain offensives and the like?

How important were rivers to the combat in world war 2?

Thank you.

warflak

Well,whenever soldiers had to cross a river,they'd primarily move quickly in an attempt to capture any available bridges. With the advances in technology,tanks especially needed to have bridges that could support their weight. Some notable illustrations of the strategic importance of bridges is seen in Operation Market Garden and also the Battle of Remagen. In the Eastern front,crossing the Volga River was done with boats,under heavy fire from the opposite bank. However,sometimes bridges were destroyed or too heavily defended. The Allies (the U.S and Britain) had a style of temporary bridge called the Bailey Bridge,that could be carried on trucks. They'd able to be quickly thrown across the length of the rivers and then they could cross in that fashion. However,the main importance was bridges. If there was no option,theyd try and swim!