My understanding is that the English Reformation at its initiation was a very top down affair, with a fair amount of popular discontent, particularly at measures such as the Dissolution of the Monasteries. However, the run up to the Civil War saw a great deal of popular action against any sign of "papism" (such as ornamentation of churches and pews) and stories of secret Catholic plots circulated widely.
So how exactly did the "ordinary people" of England go from Catholic to strikingly anti Catholic?
This is an excellent and incredibly intricate question, and any answer given will likely be an oversimplification, but I will do my best. There was undoubtedly a dramatic change in the religious outlook of the population in the century between 1529 and 1642. While a significant amount of the Reformation was “top down,” that would never have been enough to create the religious situation in 1642. Here are the key elements that explain the eventual success of the English Reformations:
Just a note on the dissolution of the monasteries. While this was a major theological decision by Henry and Thomas Cromwell, it’s harder to identify the public impact of the dissolution. Chris Harper-Bill explains that in the beginning of the sixteenth century, people were not as deeply attached to monasteries or nunneries, as they had been in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. The main function of the monasteries for the more common people was prayers for the dead & performing of the masses. Harper-Bill argues that the introduction of Friars into England was the first challenge to monastic authority (Harper-Bill, Pre-Reformation Church, pp. 40-41). Monasteries were simply less valued by the English people (or at least those wealthy enough to make wills) as bequests left in wills at the end of the fifteenth century were more often granted to orders of Friars than to monasteries. The second item was the growing practice of building private chapels or chantries (two different acts, not same act with different names) and employing a priest to say the masses. This withdrawal of economic and communal investment into the monasteries weakened their political position at large, and reduced their importance in the localities. Ethan Shagan offers a more in depth look at the dissolution of the Abbey of Hailes (Shagan, Popular Politics and the English Reformation, ch. 5). He argues that the community surrounding the Abbey were complicit, if not outright supportive in the destruction of the Abbey, as the community defaced and removed everything valuable from the building. This included the glass windows, the doors, bells, ropes, pipes, etc. Unlike the concealment of valuable religious objects in the parish of Morebath, Shagan argues these were stolen from the Abbey for personal gain, and because the Abbey had lost its sanctified status. The top down dissolution had turned these formerly sacred spaces into normal material objects (Duffy, Voices of Morebath; Shagan, pp. 162-163).