Why were the Australian Aborigines so much less advanced than basically the rest of the world?

by DonkeyHody1

The title says it all. Pretty much the only other cultures as primitive as theirs were(are?) Inuit cultures. If it just because they had to put so much time and effort into not dying because of the harsh dangerous landscape? I wouldn't think that's the case because not all of Australia is a desert. Even on Papua New Guinea, just of the cost, people there had large impressive structures. Surely after inhabiting the continent for 50,000 years an advance urban civilization could have developed.

horriblyefficient

not sure if there's been a comment already or not (invisible 1 comment. dammit reddit) but there are a few similar questions in the faq here, hopefully they answer your question https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/wiki/oceania#wiki_why_did_native_australians_not_.22progress.22.3F