How did the M48 Patton and the T-55, the two main tanks of the Cold War during 1950s, compare with each other in terms of armor, firepower, mobility, and usability?

by Hanschristopher
the_howling_cow

The M48 is notable for the odd shape of its lower and frontal hull, it being curved and boat-like. The use of steel armor on U.S. tanks reached its apex in the 1950s and 1960s; the last U.S. tank to use sheer thickness of steel plate as its primary means of protection was the M60. Similar to other U.S. tanks of the time, the M48 displayed a near-complete lack of sponsons, the upper run of tracks being essentially level with the hull top.

The M48 and T-55 offered similar levels of armor protection; the M48 was superior in some areas, the T-55 in others. All angles are from the vertical; I have rounded the values to the tenths place.

M48:

Area Actual Thickness Effective Thickness
Lower hull front Curved, two plates; 102 mm @ 35°, and 38-102 mm @ 53° 63.1-169.5 mm
Lower hull sides Curved; the majority being 90 mm @ 35° ~109.9 mm
Lower hull rear Two plates; 25 mm @ 60° and 35 mm @ 30° 40.4-50 mm
Hull floor 13-38 mm @ 90° 13-38 mm
Upper hull front (glacis) Curved, 110 mm @ 60° 220 mm
Upper hull sides N/A N/A
Upper hull rear (exhaust grille) ~25.4 mm @ 0° ~25.4 mm
Hull roof 45-57 mm @ 90° 45-57 mm
Turret front Curved, 25-178 mm @ 20-50° 38.9-205.5 mm
Gun mantlet Curved, 114 mm @ 30° 131.6 mm
Turret sides Curved, 65-115 mm @ 28-33° 77.5-130.3 mm
Turret rear Curved, 25-51 mm @ 20-90° 25-54.3 mm
Turret roof 25 mm @ 90° 25 mm

T-55:

Area Actual Thickness Effective Thickness
Lower hull front 100 mm @ 50° 174.3 mm
Lower hull sides 80 mm @ 0° 80 mm
Lower hull rear 20 mm @ 70° 58.5 mm
Hull floor 20 mm @ 90° 20 mm
Upper hull front (glacis) 100 mm @ 60° 200 mm
Upper hull sides N/A N/A
Upper hull rear 45 mm @ 17° 47 mm
Hull roof 15-30 mm @ 90° 15-30 mm
Turret front Curved, 70-200 mm @ 0-52° 113.7-200 mm
Gun mantlet N/A N/A
Turret sides Curved, 115-160 mm @ 0-45° 160-162.6 mm
Turret rear Curved; 65 mm @ 0-45° 65-91.9 mm
Turret roof 30 mm @ 85° 30.1 mm

Effective Thickness Comparison:

Area M48 T-55 Advantage
Lower hull front 63.1-169.5 mm 174.3 mm T-55
Lower hull sides 109.9 mm 80 mm M48
Lower hull rear 40.4-50 mm 58.5 mm T-55
Hull floor 13-38 mm 20 mm M48
Upper hull front (glacis) 220 mm 200 mm M48
Upper hull sides N/A N/A None
Upper hull rear ~25.4 mm 47 mm T-55
Hull roof 45-57 mm 15-30 mm M48
Turret front 38.9-205.5 mm 113.7-200 mm Draw
Gun mantlet 131.6 mm N/A M48
Turret sides 77.5-130.3 mm 160-162.6 mm T-55
Turret rear 25-54.3 mm 65-91.9 mm T-55
Turret roof 25 mm 30.1 mm T-55

Sources:

Relative Armor Calculator

90 mm Gun Tank M48 Patton (M48-M48A5 Patton), citing;

  • Hunnicutt, R.P. Patton: A History of the American Main Battle Tank, volume 1. Navato, CA: Presidio Press, 1984.

  • Crismon, Fred W. U.S. Military Tracked Vehicles. Osceola, WI: Motorbooks International, 1992.

  • Miller, David. The Illustrated Directory of Tanks of the World. Osceola, WI: MBI Publishing Co., 2000.

  • Decker, Oscar C. "The Patton Tanks: The Cold War Learning Series." Camp Colt to Desert Storm: The History of U.S. Armored Forces. Eds. George F. Hofmann, Donn A. Starry. USA: University Press of Kentucky, 1999.

  • Foss, Chris. Modern Tanks. Glasgow: HarperCollins Publishers, 1995.

  • Myszka, John. Israeli Military Vehicles: The First 50 Years. Australia: Mouse House Enterprises, 1998.

T-55 armor profile 1

T-55 armor profile 2

M48 Patton armor profile