Absolutely not, but I can see where you're coming from on this. Nazi Germany was (literally) death on inherited disorders, but it had a completely different attitude toward battlefield injuries and casualties.
First, let's go into a bit of background for folks who don't know what you do, /u/DallasDunn.
One of the core tenets of the Nazi system was a belief in "racial purity." To this end, foreign and "corrupting" influences needed to be removed from Germany, the Nazis believed. This included religions and foreigners, but it also included those who suffered from inherited disease. In July 1933, just two months after the Nazis assumed total control of Germany with the Enabling Acts, the German government instituted the Law for the Prevention of Genetically Diseased Offspring a mass sterilization program that would continue through the Nazi era.
After Germany began the war in September 1939, Hitler moved this program into a horrifying new phase by ordering the murder of disabled Germans. The T-4 program, which began with "mercy killings" of the fatally ill, expanded into the forced murder of people housed in asylums and other institutions. Ultimately, more than 200,000 disabled or ill people would be murdered under this program.
Now that you know the horrifying groundwork for where /u/DallasDunn is coming from, let's talk about why Nazi treatment of veterans differed.
I wrote about this treatment two years ago, and I'll again recommend James Diehl's The Thanks of the Fatherland for understanding this issue. To that, I'll add Carol Poore's Disability in Twentieth-Century German Culture.
As Diehl explains, the Nazi belief system prized "front experience" (Fronterlebnis) above almost all else. This is largely because the founding myth of the Nazi Party was based upon the idea that the brownshirts were an extension of Germany's WWI army and thus were fighting (in the streets, and later on the battlefield) to avenge the "stab in the back of World War I."
"The front soldier had always been a central figure in the ideology and mythology of national socialism," Diehl writes. "In the Third Reich, soldiers were idealized: their exploits in the Great War were endlessly celebrated in popular literature and film, soldiers were presented as role models for civilian society, and military virtues ─ duty, obedience, sacrifice ─ were elevated to the status of primary, rather than secondary, values."
During his rise to power, Hitler's experience as a soldier in World War I (and here I'll recommend Thomas Weber's Hitler's First War for some good myth-busting) was used as a promotional and political tool. As Weber artfully explains, Hitler's experience was as much a propaganda invention as it was fact. Furthermore, the Nazis leveraged the Weimar government's failures in veterans' care to advantage during their rise to power. Better treatment for WWI veterans was a key campaign promise by the Nazis, and they attempted to follow through on that with preferential treatment for veterans.
As Diehl writes, "In the Nazi worldview, the Weimar Republic was accordingly depicted as the negation of all that the front soldiers had stood for, while the Third Reich was portrayed as the embodiment of their virtues and the vehicle for the realization of their ─ and the nation's ─ mission."
Under the Weimar government, Germany offered a pension system called the RVG, which offered benefits based on "the degree of the victim's loss of civilian earning power" (using Diehl's terminology), the WFVG, which replaced it in 1938, called for flat payments based on the severity of the injury. It was replaced again in 1939, for a wartime world, with the WEFVG, which increased benefits for soldiers injured in combat (as compared to soldiers injured in peacetime or behind the front lines).
The WEFVG also offered military retirement programs that included jobs for disabled soldiers, particularly noncommissioned officers (likely based upon Hitler's on experience as a noncom). The WEFVG envisioned employing these soldiers as teachers in primary schools (under the Nazi system, who better to influence the next generation?) and in the civil service. As the war progressed, these mustered-out soldiers instead found themselves employed in behind-the-lines military support. They worked as air raid wardens, telephone operators or paper-pushers, as well as in factories and other operations that were semi-governmental by that point in the war. The exigencies of war also forced the Nazi government to curtail its pension programs, which had the effect of forcing these disabled men to work if they wanted to avoid hunger and other privation.
This does not even come close to answering your question (though u/The_Alaskan answered it pretty thoroughly already) but Anne Frank mentions a couple of times in her diary that Hitler would visit soldiers who lost limbs or were otherwise severely injured in battle and portrayed them as martyrs fighting for their cause (the people in the Secret Annex heard these stories on the radio).