Did St. Patrick of Ireland commit mass atrocities against Pagans?

by MacDhubstep

Follow up questions:

Are the snakes from the legend really snakes, or is it a metaphor?

Context/My own quick research: My pagan friend is adamant that St. Patrick's Day is a day about oppressing pagans. Growing up Irish-American, I was really baffled by her interpretation. I want to know if any historical scholars have any insight about this (what appears to me) pacifist 5th Century mass-Converter. Just based on my own googling-around, it seems like this whole, the snakes are metaphor thing was started by neo-pagans in the 1960's.

Also, I have read the wikipedia article about St. Patrick and the one about the holiday, so please don't just direct me there.

BrehonDubh

The short answer is no, Patrick did not commit atrocities against pagans. There is absolutely no evidence for this.

The information we have on Patrick come from his own writings - two documents, his Confession [which is an autobiography] and a later letter that he wrote to a British bounty hunter, in which Patrick rails against the bad treatment of the Irish from this apparent hunter from abroad. His Confession details Patrick's own captivity into slavery, his early time in Ireland as a slave and his escape and return to Ireland as a missionary.

The other stories on Patrick are invented propaganda from a much later time. The stories of fighting druids, lighting fires on hills to confront pagans etc. are pure invention. The snakes is an even later invention as is the shamrock iconography.

One notable aspect of the conversion of the Irish to Christianity is that there are no martyrs. It was a peaceful transition and a large part of the pagan religion got easily incorporated into early Irish Christianity.

chocolatepot