How were the Middle Eastern borders drawn after the Ottoman Empire fell?

by willow_ivy_rose

I've heard many things about the British lying to the Arabs to keep Arabia united after the fall of the Ottoman Empire but Suez interests made them break the promise. I've also heard the Hasemite (sorry if it's not spelled correctly) kingdom should've been established after the fall too.

Can someone explain or send links to credible sources about how western powers drew the borders and how it links to the current mess in the Middle East today? I'm very interested in the topic.

CptBuck

Hi there,

I've written about this a good deal in previous posts, and contributed to a couple /r/askhistorians podcast episodes that might be of interest to you on this very topic:

I've also written some posts on the emergence of "the current mess in the Middle East", my own view is that the partition of the Ottoman Empire is an important part of that, but it's not causal and it's probably massively overstated. For one thing, such explanations tend to assume that there was some version of the borders in the Middle East that might have prevented such conflict-- there was not. For another it elides that for most of the 20th century you could not have characterized the countries that are currently a "mess" as being a mess. Iraq looked pretty good in the 60s and 70s, for instance. Nor are such conflicts intractable centuries-old issues that will never go away as evidenced by the end of the civil conflict in Lebanon (even if those issues continue to define Lebanese politics.)

I've written some of my thoughts on that and issues related to "the current mess" in these two threads:

I think those will more or less cover the questions you've raised so far, I'm happy to discuss any followup questions you might have.