The primary issue here is which knight and which Turk? The definition of the English 'knight' encompasses anything between the chainmail-armored, unbarded Norman cavalry of the 1000s and the fully barded, fully plated heavy cavalrymen of the Hundred Years War. Similarly, Turks vary even more wildly, from a completely unarmored nomadic raider to an elite janissary to the heavily armored slave-soldiers that guarded the palaces of great rulers. These aren't nearly specific enough, and the Turks have an obvious advantage in this case.

Hello there. Your question is related to school work, so we just want to remind you, and any potential respondents, that our rules DO permit people to ask for help with their homework, so long as they are seeking clarification or resources, rather than the answer itself. This policy is further explained in this META Thread.

Additionally, while our users may be able to help you out here, we hope that you also will take the time to check out our six-part series, "Finding and Understanding Sources", which should hopefully prove to be helpful for you as you continue in your research.