What was the justification for the practice of purchasing officer commissions in the British army?

by adenoidcystic

It wasn't until after the Crimean war that the practice of purchasing officer commissions in the British Army ceased, and they moved towards a meritocracy for advancement in the military. What was the justification for the practice of purchasing/selling commissions? Was it considered a means of fundraising? Or simply a means of ensuring that only the nobility would control the armed forces? Was their any response when Revolutionary France started to shift to a meritocracy in the military?

CChippy

While previous questions don't address the precise points you are asking here is a previous archived question with answers including a link to a detailed study of the benefits both to the individual Officer and to the Crown of the British system

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/1hnrbx/what_were_the_effects_of_the_purchasable/

and another, similar question, here

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/1vp8bb/how_accurate_is_the_cliche_of_useless_aristocrats/