Was the Glorious Revolution really a succesful foregin invasion of the British Isles?

by DrTacoLord

I was reading an old article from the independient (link: http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/history-in-the-making-the-glorious-revolution-of-1688-91-was-really-a-dutch-invasion-this-distortion-1565642.html) that suggested that more than a local affair, the revolution was actually an invasion that lead to the end of a dynasty and only accidentally the Parliament became powerful (because William of Orange was busy fighting continental wars) could this be true? Or is an example of r/BadHistory?

DanDierdorf

There was an AMA done by a historian specializing in this period ( u/ScottSowerby ) a few years ago that discusses how the Dutch influence was perceived: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/2pprje/thursday_ama_im_scott_sowerby_associate_professor/