I fear this is more a technology question than a history question, but I'll attempt to address it as stated. No, the Power Glove was assessed as a failure in its own time. And there was simply no avoiding this reality, at any stage. Only two games (Super Glove Ball and Bad Street Brawler) were released for the product, and both of them were and are reviewed as terrible. Furthermore, only Super Glove Ball can really be regarded as fully integrating the product's design features into the game design. Other games can (in principle) be played using the Power Glove, but are a nightmare to control when using it. The design was simply cheapened to the point of unusability. It was not a Nintendo product, but rather farmed out to a third party and put on a too-short development schedule, where corners were cut until nothing of value was left. There is simply nothing good which may be said of the Power Glove or its creation. It is possible to argue, perhaps, that the idea of such a product was not necessarily inherently fraught. But as far as the realisation of that idea in the form of the Power Glove goes, everything that could go wrong, honestly, did go wrong. Cutting corners to the point of rendering the device unusably clumsy was certainly a major aspect of that failure. But the product could hardly have succeeded if it were released at a substantially higher price, given the disastrous lack of software support.