I am looking into graduate school for either history or museum studies. I have already spent about $40,000 on my undergrad, so imagine my hesitation in applying for larger schools for my graduate program going into a field that isn't exactly for the money (I just absolutely LOVE it). I have a long resume because I have always worked full time and now also have a job as a development assistant in a museum. I am wondering if employers in the museum/history fields really look at where the degree comes from. Does it really matter if it was a local school that was less expensive for me? I have always had above a 3.5 GPA. I am just nervous about applying for schools before I know what to expect. (I have also messaged r/MuseumProfessionals as they are a private group now). I will, however, move to another thread to ask if it would be better. TIA.
I don't know if this is a question for this sub, but I can tell you about my experience.
Yes, you should go to a good school. I will tell you right now that the history field can be pretty competitive. I have been working in a History Field for a while (I think almost 4 to 5 years), and I can tell you first hand that people do look at where your degree comes from. If anyone tells you that they don't look at the degree they're wrong.
BUT, that doesn't mean you have to go to the best school that you get into. For some people, they're happy with not having a prestigious title, and they go to school for the "minimum," so they can go right into their field.
For example, one of the best proffesors I have ever had in my undergrad worked at my school for 27 years, and he NEVER once applied for tenure. Why? He preferred to teach history than to publish. He would rather work on his curriculum, and other interests than publish more than what he had already done. There was no shame in that, and I have never respected someone more.
In my opinion, apply everywhere, and just see what you like best. Visit the campuses and talk to the people. Do what you want.