When listing the Kings and Queens of England, such as in this rhyme that many British kids once learnt, we generally seem to start at 1066 with William the Conqueror, despite there having been kings of a united England for some time before this. This is true of the numbering of monarchs too, in that Edward I is "the first" despite there having been King Edwards before.
I know 1066 was a seismic shift in English history, but William himself thought of his conquest as claiming his right to inherit the crown from Edward the Confessor rather than making himself the first king of a new kingdom. How/when did the convention start of understanding English kings to "begin" with William I?
hi! you may be interested in these posts
Why is it that the regnal numbers of the monarchs of England start from the Norman Conquest? For example why is Edward I not known as Edward II, and Edward the Confessor known as Edward I? featuring /u/Miles_Sine_Castrum
Why did the regnal numbers for the Kingdom of England reset after 1066 but not reset upon creation of the Kingdom of Great Britain? - /u/Algernon_Asimov and /u/Skittles_87 explain that regnal numbers were introduced in England by the Normans
Why was Edward Plantagenet dubbed "Edward I" when he was the 4th Edward to rule England? - /u/Valkine looks more closely at Edward I
more related discussion here