Samurai and Ronin warfare in Feudal Japan. Two questions.

by falithes

I've read extensively how sword fighting was not prevalent in medieval (or even Ancient ) warfare. It occurred, but swords functioned primarily as a sidearm in battle. Most combat revolved around tight formations and utilizing spears/polearms.

Question 1.) What about in Japan during the Shengoku period? Did Samurai fight in tight formations utilizing spears/polearms and only utilized katanas as a sidearm? Was it more chaotic and greater emphasis placed on individual fighting ability?

I've read that Ronin (masterless/Shogunless Samurai) were more like mercenaries rather than a soldiers in an army. A town could hire them to deal with bandits (like in the movie 7 Samurai), for example.

Question 2.) Were Ronins ever hired into armies for battle or was their primary function dealing with local small scaled conflicts like bandit raids or bounty hunting? Did their fighting style change when hired into an army versus something smaller scaled (such as banditry quelling or bounty hunting)?

Edited for time frame clarity
ParallelPain
  1. Can you define your time period? Usually Japanese history are divided into Ancient (pre-records), Classical (Asuka to Heian), Medieval (the shogunates of Kamakura, Muromachi, and Edo, each with their respective periods, with the Edo period often put under Early-Modern), and Modern (Meiji and onwards). There's a huge debate about when, if ever, was Japan "feudal", so it's hard to answer a question about "feudal" Japan. Do you know which period, or which war, you want to know about?
  2. Yes, rōnins were, at least in the Sengoku, often hired for use in battles for their skills and manpower. The Toyotomi side in the Siege of Osaka is the most famous example, being made up of predominantly rōnin mercenaries.

Also, by the standards of Classical or Early-Modern Europe, Japanese formation were quite lose.