What were casualties like for the population on the ground from aircraft fire generated from air to air combat? Obviously bullets fall to the ground. When the b17s fought off German planes, lots of bullets were fired.
Why Don't Penguins' Feet Freeze?, a collection of questions and answers from the 'Last Word' column of the New Scientist, has a question on the potential lethality of bullets fired into the air during celebrations (a question that's also come up on e.g. [Slate] (http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2011/03/watch_out_for_falling_bullets.html) and [Mythbusters] (https://mythresults.com/episode50)). One of the answers was from M. W. Evans who collected spent cartridge cases during the Battle of Britain that "drifted down slowly from the sky" and suggested that a small projectile like a .303 bullets would do "nobody much harm when it lands".
More of a threat than bullets were shells and shrapnel from anti-aircraft guns, but there's little firm data on casualties from bullets or shrapnel (see posts from myself and /u/Georgy_K_Zhukov in [this thread from a few months back] (https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/6gyj6f/were_the_effects_of_wwii_aaflak_rounds_falling/diu81va/)).