Oh, yes. In abundance.
The "peasants" part needs to be qualified somewhat. As with the 1381 revolt in England, scholars frequently question the sort of "party line" attribution of unrest and rebellion to peasants by royal/monastic/civic chroniclers. In fact, revolts could involve any blend of rural peasants, urban burghers, patricians, clergy, even nobles. The peasant villagers of Beauvoir-sur-Mer and Bois-de-Céné in western France revolted against taxation by the king in 1480; the artisans of Nuremberg had taken their turn in 1348. In 1420 Brabant, a group of nearby landed nobles joined forces with one faction of the town's patricians to start an uprising against the duke and his faction on the town council.
Samuel Cohn's excellent and compelling collection of primary sources in translation, Popular Protest in Late Medieval Europe, makes several key points about these revolts (backed up by his own secondary work, Lust for Liberty, and books/articles by other scholars--but the primary sources are utterly fascinating reading in this case). First, as noted, the frequency with which "peasant" was at least partially a misnomer, used by the revolt's opponents to help discredit the participants. Second, the wide range of severity that constituted a "revolt" in the eyes of judges meting out punishments to captured rebels--someone stirring up anti-town council sentiment in a tavern might end up executed as brutually as the leaders of an outright armed siege on the town hall. Third, these revolts were everywhere. In this particular anthology, Cohn limits his purview to France, Italy, and the Low Countries, but even that is widespread enough already (don't worry, the Holy Roman Empire, England, Iberian countries, &c. all get their turns as well).
Fourth, and most importantly, Cohn demonstrates here, and elsewhere argues, for the fundamentally political nature of the protests. That is, that the rebels show a definite understanding of the broader issues involved--it's not just "we're not gonna pay / last year's rent." They show an awareness of legal issues involving the rights to land, changes in law over time, and the use of recourse to charters and other documents to support their position. Armed revolt was never the first step; uprisings happened when negotiation and other measures failed.
From the 14th century itself, probably the most in/famous partner to the Peasants' Revolt is the Jacquerie in 1358 northern France, which managed to span almost the entire width of the country in the less than two weeks the rebels were active. The revolt of the Ciampi in 1370s-early 80s Italy is another major "high point of disaffection in medieval Europe," as Cohn calls them (standing out against a background of constant grumbling about bad conditions/advocacy for better ones); and while the timeline is a bit later, the 1524-25 German Peasants' War is the Trope Maker for massively, tragically destructive failed revolts.