Pyramids of Teotihuacan questions

by toefirefire

I just visited these and thought they were amazing. Sadly the informational signs there were not as helpful as I would have liked. I have a ton of questions about them.

One of the signs mentioned that the pyramids were partially rebuilt in the early 1900's. Do we know how much of them were in fact rebuilt? I'm thinking even with pretty modern technology it wouldn't be easy to rebuild something like that out of heavy stones. How large of an effort was it?

I understand the pyramid of the moon was used as a platform to address a gathered crowd below. These days only the first level is accessible. When I was up there I sure felt high up and far away from people. Do we know which level was used for addresses? How did the logistics of this work? Would people be able to hear a speaker or see them clearly?

How did everyone get up there? I'm in pretty good shape but got more more than a little winded going up the two pyramids. I'm guessing it wouldn't be a good look for an important person to be seen struggling to climb the steps, especially without handrails.

Finally when I was up there looking down at the modest crowd gathered I sure felt like a boss. Do we know if priests felt pretty badass being up there?

Cozijo

Since Teotihuacan is a huge site (the majority of which is still not explored) what has been open to tourist is the result of several projects each contributing their part in trying to understand this city. In terms of restorations, some of the earliest work was carried out by Leopoldo Batres in the 1900s with his explorations of the pyramid of the sun and its adjacent parts along the street of the death. Although Batres is often attributed with using dynamite to uncover the pyramid the reality is that there is no clear evidence that he ever did that, and to be honest it sounds more like a smear campaign to damage his image. He more or less uncovered and consolidated the main facade of the pyramid as we see it today. However, when you look at the end result and compared with earlier paintings and photographs, you can see tat he actually took some liberties primarily with the third body of the structure. However, the majority of the central precincts of the city were uncovered and consolidated during the 1960’s Proyecto Teotihuacan. Part scientific explorations and part restoration efforts, the Proyecto Teotihuacan was a massive undertaking that focused on uncovering some of the most important buildings at the hearth of the city. This big project consolidated most of what we can see today.

In terms of the used methodologies, INAH (the government institution in charge of everything archaeological in Mexico) uses a plethora of well-recorded interdisciplinary and rigorous techniques that helped archaeologists navigate how structures were found and what consolidation/restorations were performed to each structure. So, from a scientific perspective we can trace back what each project has done to any given building. In fact, after each project is completed, they are required to submit a report to INAH stating everything that was done, including any consolidation efforts that were performed in the case that architecture was uncovered.

To answer your question about their use, the reality if that we can not truly say with certainty what was specifically going on at the top of big buildings at Teotihuacan. This is due to several reason, including preservation, termination activities (certain areas of the city are though to have suffered from fire events towards the end of their use) post-abandonment activities (it is known for example that the aztecs did some excavations and removed objects from Teotihuacan), and also the vagaries of archaeological research. Thus is is assume through analogy from other big constructions in Mesoamerica, that being very prominent buildings at the main part of the city the big pyramids were probably temples that housed ritual activities. Unfortunately, we cannot go beyond certain generalizations with a high degree of certainty. Furthermore, we think that not everyone was allowed to go up to the temples since they may have been considered of a sacred nature and their access seems to be very restricted.

Finally, your last question is somewhat incapable of being answered because it gets into the real of phenomenology, how people experience the world, which is a very hard thing to known with a great deal of certainty in the present, let alone in the past. I really enjoyed your enthusiasm and I will be very happy to answer any followed up questions that you may have.