The United States and Native American Genocide

by ExpiresAfterUse

Frequently, the treatment of the United States of the Native American population is described as genocide. Nearly every time, multiple people claim it was not genocide, but rather the conquering nation taking the land of the conquered, even invoking the Latin phrase voe victis.

What is the historical consensus and what are the arguments for and against if this was genocide? Was it genocide or merely numerous acts of genocide? Was it even acts of genocide or are people correct in stating it was a war of conquest that Native Americans lost. Is there really a difference vetween a war of conquest and genocide?

jschooltiger

The American treatment of American Indians was a genocide (or rather, genocides) and combating genocide denial is a thing we do here. You may be interested in these posts from u/snapshot52 on the topic:

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/6kywre/monday_methods_american_indian_genocide_denial/

And

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/6mg3j3/monday_methods_american_indian_genocide_denial/