Mentioning previous answers is not intended to discourage follow-up. Any further questions, data, or debate is welcome.

You may be interested in "What caused the decline of the zeppelin as a form of transportation?" at https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/68wl4p/what_caused_the_decline_of_the_zeppelin_as_a_form/ , with answers by /u/rocketsocks and /u/Woekie_Overlord . Basically, outcompeted by airplanes over land, then flying boats, then jets. Factors: vulnerable to weather, costly (hence a slower feedback improvement path), require much larger ground facilities, hazardous, harder to fly, fragile, lower capacity ultimately; PR (like the Hindenburg), that slower improvement rate. With sources.

Edit: I've done more searching. I've discovered some more replies, along with a temporary dislike for Led Zeppelin and the Graf Zeppelin.

"How was the zeppelin effective? Wouldn't be a expensive sitting duck?" under https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/4nt0yk/how_was_the_zeppelin_effective_wouldnt_be_a/d46w466/ . rocketsocks went into more technical detail about one reason that made the zeppelin hard to fly: the static lift and load were always changing.

"Why was the use of airships not very widespread during the Second World War after their extensive use during the First World War?" at https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/5z1lbv/why_was_the_use_of_airships_not_very_widespread/ . /u/thefourthmaninaboat mentioned other flight factors: rain and ice adding weight, heat disproportionately reducing lift. Also mentioned US Navy experience.

"How prominent were zeppelins and blimps as a mode of civilian transportation/luxury in the early 20th century?" at https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/7hbm7c/how_prominent_were_zeppelins_and_blimps_as_a_mode/ . Woekie_Overlord listed more adverse factors: "not even significantly faster than the luxury steam ships", low passenger capacity, suffered in comparison even with contemporary aircraft.