People say that Christianity cost us a 1000 years of potential scientific progress. Why hadn't successful non-Christian countries (such as China) overtaken us by a large margin then?

by PanFiluta

By that logic, I would expect China to have started their first space program while we were still busy burning witches...

Edit: You all probably know what I'm talking about, but I should add that by Christianity, I meant the Catholic church/inquisition during middle-ages in Europe (the time of "heretics" burning and destroying everything that didn't agree with the general doctrine, aka anything that could have been a scientific breakthrough)

jschooltiger

The notion that "Christianity cost us 1000 years of potential scientific progress" is incorrect. It's rooted in what's now called "conflict thesis" -- that is, the idea that Religion and Science are opposed to one another. This view is outdated. You may be interested in these previous posts by u/restricteddata on the topic:

You may be interested in these past answers on the subject:

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/67pwj9/did_the_catholic_church_hold_back_scientific_and/

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/6j1b44/what_is_the_prevailing_academic_opinion_towards/

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/58vxgj/what_is_the_origin_of_the_modern_narrative_of_the/

W_I_Water

Current general academic consensus seems to be that Christianity did not "cost us a thousand years of scientific progress".

There is an excellent answer by /u/reliable_information in the FAQ:

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/sp8dc/would_the_world_be_more_technologically_advanced/?st=jfirrkyk&sh=df6016cd

I don't know how to link to the specific comment, but it's the top comment, and there is some other good information in the rest of the thread.