Evidence meaning primary sources such as: were there diaries that had people saying it was because of the inequality shown in the meeting that they decided to revolt? etc.
Many thanks!
The timeline of events leading to the storming of the Bastille is as follows:
5 May 1789 Estates General convene; 17 June 1789 National Assembly formed; 20 June 1789 Tennis Court Oath; 27 June 1789 Louis XVI recognises the National Assembly; remaining members of the clergy and noble estates ordered to unite under the National Assembly; 1 July 1789 Louis XVI orders mobilisation of troops around Paris; 11 July 1789 Louis XVI dismisses the popular Finance Minister, Jacques Necker; Lafayette delivers draft Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen to the National Assembly; 12 July 1789 Word reaches Paris of Necker's dismissal and riots break out; mobs sack Farmers General Wall; mobs seize arms and munitions; 13 July 1789 Rioting continues; citizen's provisional committee and militia are formed; 14 July 1789 Bastille is raided and arms are seized.
As we can see, the events are all inter-related but not necessarily directly causative. In my opinion, the storming of the Bastille was not directly caused by the events in Versailles; in fact, the National Assembly was winning significant political concessions. Rather, it was the dismissal of the highly popular Jacques Necker and the rumours that the King was looking to attack Paris following a build up of troops that set off the events of 12 July 1789 culminating in the storming of the Bastille.
Hmm, it does interest me so. I believe that you can find sources if you use electronic libraries of Francine libraries