There is a transcript from his speech on 14 February 1926. The collection Hitler: Reden, Shriften, Anordnung replicated the speech which some notations, but the speech is very boilerplate Hitler. The speech started with an outline of Hitler's view on German foreign policy. In short, Hitler argued that Germany needed to play its diplomatic cards correctly to loosen the belt of hostile states surrounding Germany. This could be accomplished by gaming both the UK and Italy against France. Hitler does note that any alliance with the USSR was out of the question, as such an alliance would "lead to the immediate political Bolshivization of Germany and and should be rejected as national suicide."
The Bamberg Conference is famous for Hitler's defense of the 25-Point platform of the NSDAP from amendments. However, there was more than going on here than Hitler defending the status quo. The Party's Strasser faction, sometimes mislabeled the NSDAP's "left-wing," (they were really not "left" in the sense of German politics) was pushing for a revision of the platform especially with regards to the private property of German nobles from the old Kaiserreich. This was following the SPD and KPD's lead in trying to expropriate the nobles' German property without compensation. The Strassers' loose-knit faction, which included Joseph Goebbels, wanted to support this move, albeit on terms justified by National Socialism. Hitler threw cold water on even this potential political realignment at Bamberg. Goebbels's diary entries claim that Hitler in private refused this move, with Hitler declaring "The law must remain the law for aristocrats as well. No questioning of private property!" Hitler's speech too touches on the noble question. Towards the conclusion of his speech, he laid out two-components of the Party's policy towards noble property and property in general:
- We demand that the princes be given nothing to them which they did not already own.
- But we will not tolerate the taking from them of what they already own, because we stand on the side of law, and will not give a Jewish system of exploitation a legal pretext to plunder our race to their last. Only the non-German "princes" of money, the stock market, trade, and business should be expropriated. Only when there is a guarantee that victims' goods will be returned to the German people will our reservations fall away. But that is not possible in the November democracy.
As was usual for Hitler's speeches, his ideas are often mealy-mouthed and contradictory. But the Bamberg speech though was a tactical maneuver wherein Hitler sidelined the Strasser faction but colonized some of their rhetoric. His attack on "non-German 'princes' " was in keeping with the type of anticapitalism of the German right which held that money made through finance or other effete means was not really German and tainted by Jews. Note that before he launched into his attack on these financiers, he connected the Republic's use of taxes to steal wealth as a Jewish plot against Germany. This linkage between money made without real work and Jewish penetration of the economy remained one of the hallmarks of NSDAP discourses on the economy and economic policies. In this vision, real Germans created tangible business empires that made concrete stuff, such as Krupp steel, Messerschmitt aircraft, or HAG decaf coffee while non-German interlopers got rich out of inflaming greed through the arcane wizardry of finance.
The Bamberg conference sidelined the Strassers and after a brief period of disappointment, won over Goebbels to Hitler's side. But beneath Hitler's boilerplate speech there were clear ripostes to the Strassers' call for a more aggressive form of social leveling by the Party. Hitler's speech contended that breaking Germany out of its foreign encirclement would lead to a German colonization of Eastern Europe that would free up resources for the German people. Simultaneous to this, he reaffirmed the sanctity of private property while maintaining a tantalizing hint that a NSDAP seizure of power might revisit the issue. Contemporaries within the Party like Goebbels noted that the Bamberg conference was a real defeat for Strasserism and a sign that the Party was not going to pursue a radical course of social leveling for the immediate future.