Carolingian sword and Gladius

by Svia1100

Those two are really similar in design and way of use, so did Carolingian sword originate from roman Gladius?

wotan_weevil

The evolutionary path is gladius -> spatha -> Migration Period sword -> Carolingian sword (which is more commonly called the "Viking sword", but "Carolingian sword" has plenty to recommend it as a better name).

But they aren't that similar in design. The Carolingian sword is about 50% heavier, has a blade about 50% longer, the blade has a broad fuller and a rounded tip which the gladius usually has a diamond-section or lenticular-section blade with a pointy tip. The Carolingian sword has a metal guard and pommel, while the gladius usually has an organic guard and pommel.

Over the evolutionary path above, the various features change one by one, so the transformation from gladius to Carolingian sword was gradual rather than sudden, but the final difference from start to finish was large. Beyond both being one-handed double-edged swords, there isn't much similarity.

The evolutionary path in pictures:

Since the Carolingian sword is substantially different in design from the gladius, and is much more optimised for cutting (as opposed to the cut-and-thrust gladius), the usage would be quite different. In common with the gladius, it would be used with a large shield (of different design from the shield used with a gladius), but the same could be said for very many one-handed swords of various designs. Other short swords such as the Greek xiphos and the Chinese Warring States bronze jian might have had a lot more in common with the gladius in the ways that they were used, despite lacking any close evolutionary relationship - form fits functions.