No, both because of the Commonwealth's weakness, and because all three partitions followed failed Polish rebellions against Russia. During the 1600s and early 1700s, Poland-Lithuania was in a state of near constant war. By some estimates, the invasion of Swedish King Charles X killed a greater percentage of the Polish population than did World War two - it was called the deluge for a reason. By 1720, the mass displacement of people, slaughter of the population, and economic ruin that led to the bankruptcy and poverty of many smaller landowners led to most rural landholdings being concentrated in the hands of no more than two dozen Magnates. These magnates had their own internal divisions, and the weakening of the Crown in this period left the state virtually non-functioning.

In 1717, the Commonwealth showed promise of rebounding, asa Sejm called by King Augustus the Strong after the devastating Great Northern War sought to reform and re-centalize the state. Russian Tsar Peter the Great intervened instantly He convinced a coalition of nobles to form an opposition party known as the Tarnograd confederation - Augustus was both King of Saxony and Poland-Lithuania during the war, and these men were angered by taxes imposed by the Saxons illegally during the conflict. Peter then moved his army to the site of the Sejm and took the Polish parliament hostage. Peter forced the Sejm to confine the army to the King's estates, reduce its size to less than 1/10th of the Russian army, and eject Saxon troops and officials, who at that point were the only reliable support the Saxon dynasty had in the country.

From 1717 onwards, Poland-Lithuania essentially became a Russian satellite state. After the end of the Saxon dynasty, the country was actually ruled by Catherine the Great's lover, Stanislaw August Poniatowski. The surrounding powers - Russia, Prussia, and Austria, were content to let Poland exist as long as it was weak. The situation vaguely mirrored that of the Ottoman Empire in the next century - while everyone recognized the country was the sick man of Europe, nobody wanted to kill him lest one of them gain too much of the spoils.

In 1767, under Russian pressure, the Sejm approved equality between Catholic and Orthodox subjects. This led to a Catholic revolt in 1868, which was crushed with great brutality by Russian general Aleksandr Suvorov. Despite King Poniatowski's reluctance to support the revolt, it was enormously popular and larger than the Russian expected, which alarmed Poland's neighbors as to the danger of leaving Poland-Lithuania as an in-tact state. The fear was that if it were given a chance to reform, Poland would become resurgent, and be the regional power it once was. Indeed, the country was still the third largest in Europe, trailing behind only Russia and the Ottomans.

So began the First Partition of Poland. The primary engineer was Frederick the Great of Prussia, who proposed that each of the neighboring powers should take a slice of equal value to preserve the balance of power. Austria readily agreed, while Catherine hesitated before abandoning her lover's kingdom to its fate.

By 1788, a new opportunity presented for the Polish reformists, as Austria and Russia were embroiled in new conflicts with the Turks, and chaos in Paris distracted Europe's attention. By 1791, reformers pushed through a new constitution in the style of the United States, creating a hereditary monarchy and eliminating the liberum veto which had long been the biggest single block to legislative progress. With the French revolution in full swing, the timing couldn't have been worse, and the monarchies of Europe feared the spread of revolutionary ideas. Worse yet, magnates stood to lose much of their influence under the new government, and formed a Confederation to resist the central government. Catherine the Great, motivated by a combination of anger at the "betrayal" of Poniatowski, fear of revolution, and fear of a resurgent Poland, intervened in favor of the Confederation. Poniatowski thought the war was hopeless from the onset, and capitulated quickly.

This led to the Second Partition, which reduced Poland to a rump. In 1794, the American Revolutionary War hero Kosciuszko led a last-ditch rebellion to save his country, but, once again, General Suvorov crushed the Polish rebellion. This led to the final partition of Poland, in which it ceased to exist as a state.

Resistance did not simply die down after that, however. Revolts continued for the next several decades. During the Napoleonic Wars, the Duchy of Warsaw, led by King Poniatowski's more formidable relative Jozef, was one of Napoleon's staunchest allies.

Poland never really had a chance after the Great Northern War. The doom of Poland wasn't 1768 or 1792, but 1717. Peter the Great's coup of the Sejm was a masterstroke of national sabotage. With the Saxons out of the picture, the King of Poland had no foreign troops of his own he could use to discipline the magnates. With his own army confined to his estates and reduced under 30,000, the country had fewer men than Denmark. The only resistance that could exist were rebellions by minor nobles - which were made all the more hopeless by the treachery of the magnates, who largely sided with Russia to defend their own position.

From all this, one could say the rebellions caused the partitions, but the reality is more complicated. After 1717, Poland-Lithuania was a great nation in name only. As soon as it started to become dangerous, it was eliminated.

Sources:

Celikayya, Muhammad. The Great Powers and Poland: The National and International Dynamics Behind the First Partition of Poland

Koyama, Satoshi. The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth as a Political Space: Its Unity and Complexity

Lukowski, Jerry. Disorderly Liberty: The Political Culture of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in the Eighteenth Century