When monks and statesmen, from Mesopotamia to Rome to Medieval Europe, were reading and writing texts, transcribing and memorizing, we they saying what they were reading aloud, or were they able to read in their heads like most of us today?
Is this something which has ever been mentioned in old texts, e.g. does the bible ever discuss "the voice in our head" as the voice of god, the voice of our conscience, or mention "crazy people" and prophets who heard voices similar to those with Schizoid disorders experience in modern times?
Are there any groups currently which have reading and writing, without internal voice when reading and writing? Do adults whom have recently learnt to read/write find it difficult to not make mouth movements?
[More anthropological] Do we believe that for as long as humans have had language, we have had voices in our heads? Is it believed that mental-voice could have predated language, in the sense that I feel I am able to have "wordless thoughts", such as "that's a cool rock" when my attention is captured?
This question is predicated on a few assumptions, so correct me if these are misleading me:
My armchair-historian conspiracy is that "YHWH" was never written with the vowels, not since writing god's name was as bad as saying it, but that it couldn't be written without being spoken.
P.S. A psychiatrist has discussed with me there is speculation that some children with ADHD and Asperger's may have delayed development of their "mental narrator". I have friends that claim they can remember the precise moment they "figured out" how to read in their heads as a child. Is it plausible that if we learnt to read as adults, and in a world with far less abstraction[simpler means of production, smaller vocabularies], then this leap wouldn't be accessible to most of us?
Saint Augustine documented Saint Ambrose reading silently in the 4th century:
When he read, his eyes scanned the page and his heart sought out the meaning, but his voice was silent and his tongue was still. Anyone could approach him freely and guests were not commonly announced, so that often, when we came to visit him, we found him reading like this in silence, for he never read aloud.
The fact that he considers this noteworthy indicates it wasn't common at the time, although he does not write as if it was a completely unique thing either. Either way, people were reading in their heads at least a millennium before the printing press.
AFAIK vowels are written with small dots, so Hebrew isn't an Abugida where omission of vowels would be customary for most words.
You're confusing abugida with an abjad, which Hebrew actually was, originally. More importantly Old Testamental Hebrew was oiginally 'unpointed' and had ambiguous vowels. You're constructing an elaborate theory to explain the tetragrammaton's ambiguous pronunciation while ignoring that it's not unique in that respect, in context.
Calling it a 'conspiracy theory' is apt indeed, because you're starting at the wrong end here, seemingly trying to connect some preexisting vague thoughts about language to explain YHWH. But if you want to find an explanation for the tetragrammaton in an honest inquiry the obvious starting place would be with its context an the development of Hebrew orthography and history of the scripture. In which case it becomes clear it's not a great mystery. It's the difference between systematic inquiry and playing connect-the-dots with ideas.