Follow-up question: how common were stagecoach waystations? Would they be every X miles apart or something or just wherever someone decided to build one?
Follow-up question:
How common would such a building in Wyoming, which fails to keep snow from drifting inside when the door is open, (as depicted in the actual movie) be under otherwise the same parameters as the original question?
Hey there,
If you've come to the thread and are wondering why the comments have been removed, the reason is that, on /r/AskHistorians, we'd rather have no answer than a thread cluttered with bad answers, jokes, and people saying "where are all the comments?". By removing the short, quick, bad answers that would otherwise crowd them out, the well-researched in-depth answers (that take people time to research and write) are more likely to be seen (see this graph for more detail).
This heavy moderation works: we have found that it takes an average of 9 hours for a good answer to appear on a popular thread - properly researching and writing an answer takes time - and that 90%+ of popular threads get an answer. Additionally, it's late at night on the East Coast of the US at the moment, which means that plenty of the historians interested in this topic might already be asleep. The last time we did a survey, 75% of /r/AskHistorians subscribers approved of our moderation, while another 5% thought we should be stricter (and 15% said they didn't care).
In other words, patience, good people. If you want to be reminded to look at this thread later, please see this really awesome Roundtable post for a list of ways. And if you're wondering why Reddit never shows you an AskHistorians thread with answers, consider sorting your Reddit home feed by 'Hot' rather than 'Best' - 'Best' seems to give precedence to newer posts (which are less likely to have an answer on this subreddit, of course) and threads you haven't already looked at (e.g., it'll show you something else next time you log in, even if this thread is still getting lots of upvotes because there's an actual answer now).
If you're wondering what's in the 76 removed top-level comments at the time of writing, about a third of that is people going "what happened to all of the comments?" or "[removed]". Another third is people making jokes. There also are some attempts at answering the question - and replies to those - but nothing that meets our standards for accuracy, comprehensiveness and depth, unfortunately.. All of these comments get removed on /r/AskHistorians because the huge majority of our subscribers really do want accurate, comprehensive, in-depth historical answers based on good historical practice and high-quality sources. It's amazing how many downvotes and reports an obvious shitpost can attract on a popular thread on /r/AskHistorians within minutes, thanks to our readers (if you see it, report it!)
What makes a good answer on /r/AskHistorians? Well, we want people answering questions to be able to explain not just what the basic facts are according to academic research, but why we know that these basic facts are right, and to put those basic facts into context. This is why we encourage the use of primary and secondary sources in answering questions, rather than tertiary sources like Wikipedia, podcasts and textbooks.
Unfortunately, the downside of encouraging in-depth and comprehensive answers is that we have to remove a lot of shitposts and comments wondering what happened to the removed shitposts. The upside, however, is that our contributors consistently post amazing stuff to /r/AskHistorians (which we collate the best of every week in our Sunday Digest), and daily on our Twitter. Alternatively, if you want to discuss history without these constraints, /r/history or /r/askhistory might be more appropriate subreddits for you than /r/AskHistorians.