Hi guys, I'm working on an undergraduate thesis based around the Medieval concept of the Roman Empire, specifically early medieval (800-1024), and I can see no tangible reason for a suitably powerful monarch to submit to the Pope and receive the Imperial Title. Yet monarchs waged substantial wars to the benefit of the Papacy for the promise of this title. Why?
I would really appreciate a signpost towards an author (or authors) who deals with this idea, or better yet, a /thickly/ sourced explanation.
Cheers!
I can give you a list of german historians and some of their writings, which touch the subject of Rule and Imperial self-conception. The Problem is most of it is written in german, and not much was translated into english.
For those books I could not find an english title I'll add a rough translation of the title, maybe you're able to find a translation this way.
Gerd Althoff is the leading german historian, when it comes to the Ottonians, so you might want to look that name up when looking for literature.
If you are not that bound to the time period of 800-1024, I've got bibliographies for 284-800 and 1024-1256.