I see a lot of things where it’ll say someone like a 12th century monk will wrote a historical text about something that happened during like Alfred the Great’s time. I don’t understand why we’re supposed to trust what they say, even though they couldn’t possibly have witnessed it. Am I missing something?
The monks, nuns, as well as other members of the clerus, often compiled their work partially from older sources available to them. They borrowed from these older sources to include preceding histories relevant to their own work. Also, in the case of many annals and chronicles, as well as necrologies (obituaries), they were continued by a new author on the death of his predecessor.
The relation between sources of different authors and different periods is often complicated but is nonetheless important to deduce in order to establish a source's credibility. Although I am unfamiliar with the primary sources concerning the reign of Alfred the Great, I can showcase the intricacies of how sources can be connected through another example.
In 1018 a punitive expedition led by the Duke of Lower Lorraine met its end at the hands of a numerically smaller force commanded by the Count of West-Frisia. Due to the unlikely outcome as well as the death of a number of nobles and bishops, the events found their way into numerous sources: 65 to be exact (that we know of); 37 narratives, such as annals and chronicles; 8 necrologies; 15 diplomatic sources, mainly charters; 5 others, a couple letters as well as a 17th century forgery.
In the context of your question, the narrative sources are the most interesting, as academics have established the relation between these sources through comparative analysis; there were some striking similarities. The 37 narrative sources that allude to the Battle of Vlaardingen are listed below, ordered roughly on the year they were written. The number in the first column will be used later to illustrate how the sources are connected.
| # | TITLE | AUTHOR | YEAR |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thietmarus chronicon | Thietmar of Merseburg | 1018 |
| 2 | De diversitate temporum | Alpertus of Metz | 1021-1024 |
| 3 | Miraculae S. Waldburgae Tielensia | Alpertus of Metz | 1022-1023 |
| 4 | Gesta episcoporum Cameracensium | Unknown | 1024-1025 |
| 5 | Annales Queldinburgenses | Unknown | ~1025 |
| 6 | Codex Augiensis | Herman of Reichenau | 1048-1054 |
| 7 | Annales Sancti Maximini | Unknown | Mid 11th century |
| 8 | Gesta ep. Tungrensium, Trajectensium, et Leodensium | Anselmus | 1052-1056 |
| 9 | Annales Leodienses | Unknown | 1058-1086 |
| 10 | Brunwilarensis Monasterii Fundatorum Actus | Unknown | Shorty after 1063 |
| 11 | Bertholdi Annales | Berthold of Reichenau | 1066-1080 |
| 12 | Annales Altahenses Maiores | Unknown | 1073-1075 |
| 13 | Bernoldi Chronicon | Bernold of Konstanz | 1075-1100 |
| 14 | Lamberti Hersfeldensis Annales | Lamberti of Herfeld | ~1078 |
| 15 | Iocundi Translatio S. Servatii | Jocundus | 1088 |
| 16 | Sigeberti Gemblacensis chronica | Sigebert of Gembloers | 1088-1111 |
| 17 | Chronicon sancti Huberti Andaginensis | Lambertus Parvus | 1098-1106 |
| 18 | Annales Laubienses | Unknown | After 1098-16th century |
| 19 | Ruperti Chronicon sancti Laurentii Leodiensis | Rupert of Deutz | ~1100 |
| 20 | Annales Egmundenses | Unknown | 1112-1121 |
| 21 | Liber Sancti Adalberti | Unknown | 1125-1133 |
| 22 | Annales Parchenses | Unknown | 1140-1148 |
| 23 | Gesta episcoporum Virdunensium | Laurentius of Liege | 1144 |
| 24 | Annales Remenses et Colonienses | Unknown | ~1150 |
| 25 | Vita Wolbodonis Episcopi Leodiensis | Reinerus | 1161-1182 |
| 26 | Annales Sancti Iacoba Leodiensis | Lambertus Parvus | 1173-1194 |
| 27 | Vita Balderici episcopi Leodiensis | Unknown | Late 12th century |
| 28 | Annales Elmarenses | Unknown | 12th century |
| 29 | Annales Yburgenses | Unknown | 12th century |
| 30 | Balduini Ninovensis Chronicon | Boudewijn of Ninove | Mid 13th century |
| 31 | Chronicon Egmundanum | Unknown | 1269-1272 |
| 32 | Rijmkroniek van Holland | Unknown | 1280-1282 |
| 33 | Chronographia Johannis de Beke | Johannis de Beke | ~1346 |
| 34 | Bella campestria inter episcopos Trajectenses et comites Hollandie | Unknown | ~1348 |
| 35 | Annales Tielenses | Unknown | 14th-15th century |
| 36 | Chronicon Tielense | Unknown | ~1450 |
| 37 | Annala Uladh | Ruaidhri Ó Luinín | Late 15th century |
(1/2)
Medieval historians didn’t always write ‘centuries’ after events happened. There were chroniclers who kept records of current events; history as we think of it today was what was received either orally (and usually only spanned one or two generations) or what was given via written texts, but only a select few of the medieval population would have had either the access or ability to read those texts. It might help to refocus your question: why did medieval historians record what they did? By looking at what they noted and recorded, you can get a glimpse into what was important to them. A major part of a historian’s skill set is the ability to get their head into the heads of other people, rather than the other way around.