Since an early age I've loved history as a hobby, playing historical games (AoE), watching documentaries and reading historical books in my free time. But I've never really thought of it as a career. When it came to what to study in university, I went with an IT field (Software Engineering) since it seemed safer and more in demand. But now that I'm done with my bachelors and starting my first job I feel like this really isn't for me, and I've been seriously thinking about doing a masters degree or something similar in a field I'm more interested in, that I feel passionate about. The first thing that popped in my mind was History.
So I wanted to ask this to you Historians out there:
Any other general tips regarding the topic would be welcomed as well.
Great question! I wrote an article on this for the American Historical Association last year, looking at the statistics of what people with a history undergrad end up doing. I know that you said you were looking at history at the grad level rather than at the undergrad, but I hope this gives you a place to start.
So, the first thing to note is that the vast majority of people who take history as their undergrad major do not become professional historians. People in STEM fields love using this to cudgel humanities majors, because the career path isn't as obvious as software development or mechanical engineering. But the good thing is that studying history prepares you to do a lot of things, rather than just one.
Many who take history majors end up being lawyers or teachers at the K-12 level, for example. But so too do you get quite a lot of people ending up being in management of businesses-- which makes a certain degree of sense since history degrees prioritize being able to analyze difficult, often qualitative data, being able to construct an argument, being able to see the forest *and* the trees, and write well.
I don't have as much data to back up what people do with masters' in history, so I will have to speak somewhat more anecdotally. It really depends if you are doing this because you absolutely want to get a career in an historical profession or whether you're a bit more ambivalent (I would personally advocate for the ambivalent route-- if you can find something else you really enjoy doing that uses the skills you got in your MA, do it). The history-related fields are either the professoriate for those very few people who can actually get jobs in it these days, or working in museums, libraries, archives, heritage sites, in publishing nonfiction, working as a freelance writer or other fields. None of these are easy professions to get into, but those are some of the roads you can try to go down if you want history to be an explicit part of your professional life.
I'm sorry if this seems a little bit jaded, but I want to ensure that you know it's not a rosy picture to work specifically as a professional historian. That being said, it is a great major if you want to study something fascinating and then use the skills you acquire there in a range of professional careers.
Good luck!
What are the usual career paths for a historian
If you complete your bachelor's, masters and phd, being a academic/professor is the number one choice. you can specialise in museum studies and go into curating. Otherwise, you can write for history publications(media). There is also archaeology if you like that. Also any government heritage board might hire if they are looking for researchers. Thats all i can think of for now. Demand really depends on your location.
Bear in mind that I'm not American and therefore my perspective will not be specialized for someone studying history in the US, but rather try to apply a general review:
What are the usual career paths for a historian?
Academia/docency is probably the main path; there are some room to be filled in archivistics, museology, archeaology, but the bulk of historians are probably teachers of some sort. It's unlikely to get a regular office job working in this field.
What are the usual career paths for a historian?
I feel like most universities expect their students to further procure their academic endeavours, so most likely you'll be incentivized to publish or pursue a Masters or PhD. You might try to make carreer inside museums, but that varies a lot from place to place, if the museum's administration is public or private, how much politics is needed, etc.
Can someone become a somewhat decently respected Historian without a history degree, through lesser singular courses/ his own personal research perhaps?
Eh? I really wanna say yes but realistically no, not really. In all of those years of humankind contemplating the human past and human activity, some great minds have definitely been built from outside the system. That being said, most renowned scholars have undergone classical training, if not in history proper, in at least some related field like classics, geography or sociology. There is obvious value to pursue knowledge in any case, so if you want to study history for yourself I heavily encourage it, but in this day and age it is extremely difficult to make a carreer out of it if not through traditional means.
There are may history-related career fields to choose from. I've starred the ones that usually require PhDs or Masters degrees.