I’m reading “What They Fought For (1861-1865)” and one of the correspondence letters from a VA Cavalry Officer compares his hatred for yankees to the “Thugs of India”. The context doesn’t provide whether it’s hate from or toward the Thugs of India but it’s capitalized so I’m assuming it was a familiar reference at the time...?
They were especially ruthless bandits, who invariably murdered their victims before robbing them, but not – as they are usually presented – hereditary bands of religious fanatics offering human sacrifices to the goddess Kali. I touched on the key points in this earlier response:
Note that, while in my opinion there is decent evidence that Thug groups did actually exist, a significant group of postcolonial lit scholars have argued fiercely that they were nothing but the invention of the British colonial administration.
It's a tangent but in 19th century Britain (mostly London it seems) there was a garroting panic where people believed criminals were going around strangling people in a similar way to how it was reported Indian thugs/thuggee had done. The comparison was actually made at the time, especially in newspapers which loved to sensationalise these events.