Specifically, "Why does immigration in the United States become more restrictive over time?"

by LuvP1rate

I'm currently writing a historiographical paper over immigration in the United States, and after debating upon different sources for doing three paradigm shifts have hit a dead-lock on the subject, as this is the first time I have ever written a history paper. I've been mainly focusing on demographics, but realized that they may not be what I should be focusing on as the topic of my paper was too broad when at that stage, when I was there I was going to use the following literature,

The Atlantic Migration - Marcus Lee Hansen

Strangers in the Land: Patterns of American Nativism - John Higham

The One and the Many: Reflections on the American Identity. - Arthur Mann

Old World Traits Transplanted - Robert E. Park & Miller A. Herbert

Letters from An American Farmer: And Other Essays - St John De Crevecoeur

Immigration Reconsidered: History, Sociology, and Politics. -Virginia Yans-McLaughlin

After reading these works, I realized that they were too broad for the work in general, and now I am struggling to find books from orthodox, revisionist, and post-revisionist views to support the idea of why America closes its doors. If someone could help out in any fashion, or just in general point me in a good direction, you would have my eternal thanks. Or even suggestions on differing topics that could be easier, as my overall topic is "immigration" for the United States.

LuvP1rate

Here's an update to where I am at,

I've switched from closing doors to the assimilation-pluralism dichotomy debate, and have chosen the following literature to support it through three paradigm shifts.

1st Paradigm

Becoming American : an ethnic history / Thomas J. Archdeacon. New York: Free Press ; London : Collier Macmillan, [1983]

Sincerity and Authenticity / Lionel Trilling. Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press, [1973, c1972]

2nd Paradigm

Assimilation, American style / Peter D. Salins. New York: Basic Books, [1997]

Beyond white ethnicity: developing a sociological understanding of Native American identity and reclamation / Kathleen J. Fitzgerald. Lanham: Lexington Books, [2007]

3rd Paradigm

Disciplinary Spaces : Spatial Control, Forced Assimilation and Narratives of Progress since the 19th Century / Sophie Wagenhofer, Andrea Fischer-Tahir. Bielefeld : transcript-Verlag, [2017]

Blood will tell: Native Americans and asimilation policy / Katherine Ellinghaus. Lincoln : University of Nebraska Press, [2017]

The first paradigm indicates a approach for inclusion for assimilation, whilst the second paradigm gives the reasoning that they combine there culture and the naturalization process. The third revisits these, but also shows that these things were implemented through the altering of behavior and dis-empowering of these individuals to allow for assimilation.

Iphikrates

Hi - we as mods have approved this thread, because while this is a homework question, it is asking for clarification or resources, rather than the answer itself, which is fine according to our rules. This policy is further explained in this Rules Roundtable thread and this META Thread.

As a result, we'd also like to remind potential answerers to follow our rules on homework - please make sure that your answers focus appropriately on clarifications and detailing the resources that OP could be using.

Additionally, while users may be able to help you out with specifics relating to your question, we also have plenty of information on /r/AskHistorians on how to find and understand good sources in general. For instance, please check out our six-part series, "Finding and Understanding Sources", which has a wealth of information that may be useful for finding and understanding information for your essay.