How did ancient architects of large stone buildings like castles, palaces, and cathedrals select sites suitable to support the immense weight of these buildings?

by NetworkLlama

The walls of even a small castle would entail huge ground pressures, and with many of these structures placed on hills, it seems like bedrock would often be very far below the surface. Even a slight disparity could cause a wall to tip out and weaken the structure.

BRIStoneman

The truth is that in some cases they didn't. Winchester Cathedral is a prominent example: built on the plain between two rivers, the cathedral was prone to such subsidence during its construction that basically none of its internal lines are parallel or perpendicular. In the early 20th century, the whole structure came so close to collapse that a frogman was employed to go into the flooded mud underneath the building and retroactively build a series of cement foundations to keep the building standing. You can read about his frankly heroic actions here. A common running joke among medieval archaeologists is that if you visit any medieval cathedral, it's a safe bet to ask when, not if, the tower collapsed.